Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Æijë¶ó¸¶¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÇϾǰúµÎ¿¡ ÀÎÀ§ÀûÀ¸·Î Çü¼ºÇÑ °ñÁõ½ÄüÀÇ Æò°¡

EVALUATION OF ARTIFICIAL OSTEOPHYTE IN MANDIBULAR CONDYLES USING PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1992³â 22±Ç 1È£ p.77 ~ 85
ÇÑÇü¼ö, ±èÀºÁ¤,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÇÑÇü¼ö (  ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³
±èÀºÁ¤ (  ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç

Abstract

ÀúÀÚ´Â Æijë¶ó¸¶ ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¾Ç°üÀý Áø´Ü½Ã¿¡ Áø´ÜÇÐÀû À¯¿ë¼ºÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§
ÇÏ¿© 5°³ÀÇ °ÇÁ¶ µÎ°³°ñÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ 4ºÎÀ§¿¡ °¢°¢ ÀÎÀ§ÀûÀ¸·Î Çü¼ºÇÑ °ñÆíÀ» ºÎ
Âø½ÃÄÑ ÇÇ»çü¸¦ Åë»óÀûÀÎ À§Ä¡, Àü¹æÀ¸·Î 25§® À̵¿½ÃŲ À§Ä¡ ¹× ÀüÈÄ ¹Ý´ë¹æÇâÀ¸·Î À§Ä¡
½ÃŲ »óÅ¿¡¼­ ÃÔ¿µÇÏ¿© ±× »óÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
ÇÇ»çü°¡ Åë»óÀûÀÎ À§Ä¡¿¡ ÀÖÀ» °æ¿ì¿¡´Â °ñÁõ½Äü°¡ Àü¿ÜºÎ¿Í ÀüÁߺο¡ ÀÖÀ» ¶§ Àü³»ºÎ
¿Í »ó¹æºÎ¿¡ ÀÖÀ» ¶§º¸´Ù °üÂûÀÌ ¿ëÀÌÇÏ¿´´Ù(p<0.01).
ÇÇ»çü°¡ 25§® Àü¹æÀ̵¿ÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â °ñÁõ½Äü°¡ ÀüÁßºÎ¿Í Àü³»ºÎ¿¡ ÀÖÀ» ¶§ Àü¿ÜºÎ¿Í »ó
¹æºÎ¿¡ ÀÖÀ» ¶§º¸´Ù °üÂûÀÌ ¿ëÀÌÇÏ¿´´Ù(p<0.05).
ÇÇ»çü°¡ ¹Ý´ë¹æÇâÀ¸·Î À§Ä¡ÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â °ñÁõ½Äü°¡ ÀüÁߺο¡ ÀÖÀ» ¶§ ŸºÎÀ§¿¡¼­º¸´Ù °ü
ÂûÀÌ ¿ëÀÌÇÏ¿´´Ù(p<0.05).
°ñÁõ½Äü°¡ Àü³»ºÎ¿¡ ÀÖÀ» ¶§ ÇÇ»çü¸¦ Àü¹æÀ¸·Î À̵¿½ÃŲ °æ¿ì¿¡ ÇÇ»çü°¡ Åë»óÀûÀÎ À§
Ä¡¿¡ ÀÖÀ» °æ¿ìº¸´Ù °üÂûÀÌ ¿ëÀÌÇÏ¿´´Ù(p<005).
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of panoramic
radiography for diagnosis of temporomandibular joint.
Five dry skulls were selected for this study and artificial osteophyte was attached to
four different areas of the mandibular condylar head. And then, the author had taken
panoramic radiographs with the head in conventional position, 25§® forward position and
reverse position in mouth opening state.
Three dental radiologists evaluated the radiographic images of osteophyte in 60
panoramic radiographs.
The results were as follows:
In conventional position, osteophyte on the anterolateral and anterocentral area of the
condylar head was best seen(p<0.01).
In 25§® forward position, osteophyte on the anterocentral and anteromedial area was
best seen (p<0.05).
In reverse position, osteophyte on the anterocentral area was best seen (p<0.05).
Osteophyte on anteromedial area was better seen in 25§® forward position than in
conventional position (p<0.05).

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸